Who really needs a CV, or curriculum vitae, instead of a traditional resume? The answer isn’t as easy as you might think. It depends on the profession, the individual, and how progressive or conservative the institution they are applying to is, as well as the ultimate purpose of the document.

Years ago it was simply accepted that teachers, college professors and others in academia would use CVs. They are still popular, but many times these days those wishing to begin careers teaching will use resumes that concentrate on accomplishments, avoiding the long lists of publications, speaking engagements, and other items that the CV can contain. Also, those new to a profession may opt for the resume rather than the CV because they are too young in their profession to have those longs lists. Others prefer the graphic appeal of a professionally prepared resume.

The CV is an older, more traditional style, and tends to be longer than a resume, running to several pages. It has also been used in the past for physicians and attorneys. However, those professions are also becoming more open to the newer resume formats. If a professor is submitting a publication and is sure that the CV will be examined, then the CV may be appropriate. Also, if applying for a research position the CV may be preferred. But, if the professor is applying for a teaching position, and it is competitive, then a resume may get better results. Also, those who are called upon to be expert witnesses for the courts often use CVs rather than resumes in order to completely list all possible qualifications. The best way to answer this question in each individual situation is to consult a professional resume writer, discussing how the resume will be used.

Popularity: 8%